Pupil Premium Strategy Statement 2016-2017
Pupil Premium Strategy Statement
|
|||||
School |
Northwick Park Primary and Nursery Academy, Third Avenue, Canvey Island, Essex SS8 9SU |
||||
Academic Year |
2016-17 |
Total PP budget |
£337,920 |
Date of most recent PP Review |
|
Total No. of Pupils |
470 |
Number of pupils eligible for PP |
256 |
Date of next internal review of this strategy |
09/17 |
|
||||
(The following show the new testing arrangement outcomes for the 2014 national curriculum change) |
Pupils eligible for PP (40) |
Pupils not eligible for PP (21) |
||
% reaching the expected standard in reading, writing and maths |
28% |
60% |
||
% reading the higher standard |
0% |
7% |
||
% reaching the expected standard in reading |
36% |
68% |
||
% reaching the expected standard in writing |
56% |
86% |
||
% reaching the expected standard in mathematics |
49% |
77% |
||
% making at least expected progress in reading |
-2.4 |
0.3 |
||
% making at least expected progress in writing |
-0.4 |
0.1 |
||
% making at least expected progress in mathematics |
0.4 |
0.2 |
||
|
||||
In-school barriers |
||||
A. |
The change in curriculum in 2014 means that we have worked hard to close gaps and diminish differences between pupil premium pupils and their peers. |
|||
B. |
Social/emotional issues as a results of bereavement or safeguarding concerns to support with self-regulation, independence and self-esteem. |
|||
External barriers |
||||
C. |
At every measurable stage, children’s attainment is below National expectation. |
|||
D. |
Delayed oral and language skills. |
|||
E. |
Low attendance/poor punctuality because of issues arising from home. |
|||
F. |
High levels of mobility. |
|||
G. |
Maintaining the enthusiasm for learning outside of school e.g., reading regularly at home, visiting places of interest linked to curriculum. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Success Criteria |
|||
A. |
Pupils make better than expected progress.
Attainment is at least in line with National Performance. |
|
||
B. |
Pupils demonstrate improved learning behaviours. Increase in attainment. Accelerated progress. |
Impact on attainment and progress. |
C. |
Improved attendance of pupils. Improved attainment/better than expected progress as a result of improved attendance. |
Regular monitoring of attendance shows improved attendance. Parent/carers engage with attendance officer at school and individual initiatives. |
D. |
Improved language development. |
Impact on attainment and progress. |
|
||||||
Academic year |
2016 – 2017 |
|||||
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies. |
||||||
|
||||||
Desired outcome |
Chosen action/ approach |
What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? |
How will you ensure it is implemented well? |
Staff lead |
When will you review implementation? |
|
Better than expected progress of Pupil Premium, including more able dis-advantaged. |
Additional ●5 teacher in all year groups to enable pupils to be taught in smaller groups for English and Maths. Budget cost £110,000 Additional Learning Support Assistants in all lower ability sets. Budget cost £30,000
|
Pupils make better progress if their teaching is targeted at their ability level. |
Impact evidenced in books. Observations of delivery progress data. |
SLT Subject leaders. |
½ termly data scrutiny and pupil progress meetings. |
|
Accelerated progress of EYFS pupils. Attainment in EYFS exceeds previous year GLD. |
EYFS specific interventions led by additional LSA in class.
Budget cost £25,000 |
Evidence from EET/Sutton Trust shows that EYFS intervention is one of the most impactful strategies.
In school data shows that pupils who have specific EYFS intervention make accelerated progress.
|
Observation at delivery – data analysis of impact. |
EY leader. |
½ termly. |
|
|
|||||
Desired outcome |
Chosen action/ approach |
What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? |
How will you ensure it is implemented well? |
Staff lead |
When will you review implementation? |
Increase in attain-ment of pupils in receipt of PPG. |
LSA Interventions Diminishing differences through timely intervention e.g., Daily reading for all KS1 pupils. Maths Top Up. Speech/language. Social skills, lego therapy. Budget £60,000 |
Pupils do not read regularly at home and will not make progress. |
Observations of delivery.
Progress and data scrutiny. |
H.T. + 1M |
½ termly through data scrutiny and progress meetings. |
Increase in attainment of pupils in receipt of PPG. |
Teacher lead inter-ventions 1:1 tutoring. Budget £40,000 ●2 Music Teacher Budget £8,000 |
Known impact from timely and targeted intervention boosters. Engagement of pupils. Historical impact. |
DHT to lead Maths/ Reading boosters. Weekly liaison with Yr.6 teachers. |
DHT/Subject leaders. |
Half termly through the PPM process. |
Identify pupils with very low level of language development for Intervention. |
Trained LSA to screen all pupils using welkomm Budget cost £2,000 |
Poor language development is effecting progress and number of pupils achieving GLD. |
Training for staff. Analysis of screening data to inform intervention planning. |
F/S manager. |
Annually. |
|
|||||
Desired outcome |
Chosen action/ Approach |
What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? |
How will you ensure it is implemented well? |
Staff lead |
When will you review implementation? |
Improved attendance/ punctuality. |
Attendance officer to support families to improve attendance and punctuality. Budget cost £12,000 |
Pupils who do not attend school make less progress than pupils who do. |
Analysis of dis-advantaged group attendance and punctuality. Intervention of attendance officer to support families with attendance and punctuality. |
H.T. Attendance officer. |
½ termly. |
Improved pupil’s wellbeing. |
School councillor to support all pupil’s wellbeing through a range of strategies and to work with individual pupils. Budget £20,000 |
If we can remove/ improve some emotional barriers to learning, attainment will improve. |
Pupils will be identified and monitored through CAS meetings. |
Bonnie. |
Annually. |
Behaviour social and emotional support for Y6 pupils. |
LSA dedicated time to support individual pupils. Budget cost £10,000 |
Immediate response will prevent escalation of issues. |
Pupils will be identified by Y6 staff and monitored through CAS meetings. |
Bonnie. |
Annually. |
All pupils to access school visits, activities and external visitors which enhance the curriculum. |
All activities are either free or heavily subsidised. Budget £5,000 |
Promote enthusiasm for learning by delivering an exciting and engaging curriculum. |
Feedback from pupils and staff. Work scrutiny following activity/event. |
Year group leaders. |
Annually. |
Promote the children’s interests. All pupils access extra curriculum activities. |
All pupils to be encouraged to attend extra curriculum activities and be actively participating in children’s initiatives. Budget £5,000 |
Children who engage in out of schools learning achieve better in school. |
Monitoring of activities. Survey the children about activities they would like to see offered. |
Children’s Universities co-ordinator. |
½ termly. |
Pupils engage in learning outside the classroom. |
Daily homework club. Early morning IT interventions. Budget £5,000 |
Many children do not have the facilities to complete their homework at home or have internet access. |
Ensure good staff ratios to support the children. |
DHT. |
Annually. |
Children have quality reading books to choose. |
Restock book boxes. Budget £7,920 |
Children will be encouraged to engage with reading materials. |
Pupil perception surveys. Reading data. |
Reading lead. |
Annually. |